/
1x
Advertisement
Living

How workplaces punish women for being ambitious

The problem with "leaning in" is that the qualities women need to get ahead are the same ones that get them branded as “shrill.”
By Deborah Aarts, Canadian Business
IMAGE DISTRIBUTED FOR FACEBOOK - Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg addresses the sold-out crowd at the Facebook Fit "Small Business Boot Camp" at Facebook Headquarters, on Tuesday, August 5, 2014 in Menlo Park, Calif. ( Photo, Alison Yin/Invision for Facebook/AP Images.

This article was originally published by Canadian Business

Say I’m trying to get you to read this column. I could tell you to read it because I’m an experienced writer with something relevant to say about a topic I’ve researched extensively — but then I’d sound pushy and arrogant. Or I could gently suggest you might want to read it, if it’s not too much trouble — but then I’d come across as too timid, lacking confidence in my own abilities.

Welcome to the maddening reality of being a woman trying to get ahead in business. The damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don’t dichotomy is, of course, precisely the struggle Sheryl Sandberg articulated in her landmark 2013 book, Lean In — a text intended to incite, if not an outright gender-parity revolution, at least some meaningful change. But three years after the book’s publication, things haven’t improved much. In addition, the bestseller’s main prescription — for women to double down and aggressively pursue career advancement — isn’t producing the intended effect.

Examples of this abound. Researchers Christine Exley of Harvard Business School, Muriel Niederle of Stanford University and Lise Vesterlund of the University of Pittsburgh recently did a set of experiments related to female aggression in on-the-job negotiations in which, as they write, “we saw that women hurt themselves financially when they followed a blanket recommendation to always ask for more.” When tech entrepreneur Kieran Snyder analyzed performance reviews done by a diverse group of managers at a variety of companies a few years ago, she found that constructive feedback given to women included strong elements of “negative personality criticism” that were all but absent from the suggestions for men.

Advertisement

The Chatelaine Q&A: Anne-Marie Slaughter on work-life balance


No shock, then, that according to 2015 research done by the non-profit LeanIn.Org and McKinsey & Company, women remain under-represented “at every level” of corporations. The study found only marginal improvements toward parity in senior and executive leadership positions since 2012; at the current pace of change, it will take 100 years to reach gender equality in the C-suite. And it’s not because women aren’t willing (and able) to advance: “There is compelling evidence that women are disadvantaged by company practices and culture,” the study says.

And that’s the issue. Nothing is going to change in any meaningful way until organizations are less inclined to penalize women who demonstrate ambition. Framing the issue as one of self-advocacy — that it’s on women alone to lean in and pull themselves up the corporate ladder — absolves employers of their responsibility to create environments in which women are not punished for doing so.

“But our company isn’t part of the problem!” some managers might say. “It’s a meritocracy, a great place for women to work!” But is it really? Some of policies may be preventing female staffers from advancing, without managers even knowing it.

Advertisement

Sophie Grégoire-Trudeau's call for help sets a good example


Take Google, one of the most innovative companies around. It has a much-lauded performance-management program in which candidates must not only detail their accomplishments that warrant a step up the org chart, but also, crucially, solicit endorsements from their peers. In the words of one Quora commenter, getting ahead at Google means spending “considerable amounts of time and energy marketing yourself.”

Such programs are meant to eliminate nepotism and patronage, and on that front they can be effective. But, surprise! Women tend not to feel super comfortable with self-promotion—not due to timidity or inferiority, but because most of us know doing so will brand us as being “shrill” or “difficult.” (Surprise again! Men hold 78% of Google’s leadership positions.)

Any company with a serious desire to correct gender imbalances in its ranks must begin by taking a close look at its own operational structures and professional development schemes to make sure unconscious biases aren’t blocking bright, capable women from stepping up. Because a change this big can’t come from just the grassroots. Yes, we women have to keep leaning in. But our employers need to meet us halfway.

Advertisement

More:
A woman should be the next Bond. Here are 8 options
5 reasons every 19-year-old should read Lena Dunham’s new book
Here’s why we need gender-neutral washrooms

GET CHATELAINE IN YOUR INBOX!

Subscribe to our newsletters for our very best stories, recipes, style and shopping tips, horoscopes and special offers.

By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Copy link
The cover of Chatelaine magazine's spring 2025 issue, reading "weekend prep made easy"; "five delicious weeknight meals", "plus, why you'll never regret buying an air fryer"; "save money, stay stylish how to build a capsule wardrobe" and "home organization special" along with photos of burritos, chicken and rice and white bean soup, quick paella in a dutch oven, almost-instant Thai chicken curry and chicken broccoli casserole in an enamelled cast-iron skillet

Subscribe to Chatelaine!

Want to streamline your life? In our Spring 2025 issue, we’ll show you how—whether it’s paring down your wardrobe, decluttering your messiest spaces or spending way less time cooking thanks to an easy, mostly make-ahead meal plan for busy weeknights. Plus, our first annual Pantry Awards.